21 year old artist wandering the face of this earth and learning all the while. I doodle a lot, I like a band called Radiohead (a lot) and I like making friends. Things you are likely to see here: my doodles, radiohead, and images that inspire me or I just find aesthetically pleasing. I have a lot of passions and interests, and all will be represented in this space at one time or another. Please Enjoy your Stay.

Giveupthelotus

Reblogged from Artemis Dreaming

artemisdreaming:


Above: Vincent van Gogh, Self-Portrait Dedicated to Paul Gauguin, 1888
.
Letter from Vincent van Gogh to Theo van GoghArles, 7 October 1888
.
My dear Theo,
Many thanks for your letter. How glad I am for Gauguin; I shall not try to find words to tell you - let’s be of good heart.
I have just received the portrait of Gauguin by himself and the portrait of Bernard by Bernard and in the background of the portrait of Gauguin there is Bernard’s on the wall, and vice versa.
.

“Self portrait dedicated to Vincent van Gogh (Les Miserables),” Gauguin
.

“Self-portrait with portrait of Gauguin”, Emile Bernard 
.
The Gauguin is of course remarkable, but I very much like Bernard’s picture. It is just the inner vision of a painter, a few abrupt tones, a few dark lines, but it has the distinction of a real, real Manet.
The Gauguin is more studied, carried further. That, along with what he says in his letter, gave me absolutely the impression of its representing a prisoner. Not a shadow of gaiety. Absolutely nothing of the flesh, but one can confidently put that down to his determination to make a melancholy effect, the flesh in the shadows has gone a dismal blue.
So now at last I have a chance to compare my painting with what the comrades are doing. My portrait, which I am sending to Gauguin in exchange, holds its own, I am sure of that. I have written to Gauguin in reply to his letter that if I might be allowed to stress my own personality in a portrait, I had done so in trying to convey in my portrait not only myself but an impressionist in general, had conceived it as the portrait of a bonze, a simple worshiper of the eternal Buddha.
And when I put Gauguin’s conception and my own side by side, mine is as grave, but less despairing. What Gauguin’s portrait says to me before all things is that he must not go on like this, he must become again the richer Gauguin of the “Negresses.”
I am very glad to have these two portraits, for they finally represent the comrades at this stage; they will not remain like that, they will come back to a more serene life.
And I see clearly that the duty laid upon me is to do everything I can to lessen our poverty.
No good comes the way in this painter’s job. I feel that he is more Millet than I, but I am more Diaz then he, and like Diaz I am going to try to please the public, so that a few pennies may come into our community. I have spent more than they, but I do not care a bit now that I see their painting—they have worked in too much poverty to succeed.
Mind you, I have better and more saleable stuff than what I have sent you, and I feel that I can go on doing it. I have confidence in it at last. I know that it will do some people’s hearts good to find poetic subjects again, “The Starry Sky,” “The Vines in Leaf,” “The Furrows,” the “Poet’s Garden.”
.

“Starry Night over the Rhone,” Vincent van Gogh
.

“The Green Vineyard,” Vincent van Gogh
.

“Ploughed Field,” (The Forrows) Vincent van Gogh
.

“Public Park with Weeping Willow: The Poet’s Garden I,” Vincent van Gogh
.
So then I believe that it is your duty and mine to demand comparative wealth just because we have very great artists to keep alive. But at the moment you are as fortunate, or at least fortunate in the same way, as Sensier if you have Gauguin and I hope he will be with us heart and soul. There is no hurry, but in any case I think that he will like the house so much as a studio that he will agree to being its head. Give us half a year and see what that will mean.
Bernard has again sent me a collection of ten drawings with a daring poem - the whole is called At the Brothel.
You will soon see these things, but I shall send you the portraits when I have had them to look at for some time.
I hope you will write soon, I am very hard up because of the stretchers and frames that I ordered.
What you told me of Freret gave me pleasure, but I venture to think that I shall do things which will please him better, and you too.
Yesterday I painted a sunset.
Gauguin looks ill and tormented in his portrait!! You wait, that will not last, and it will be very interesting to compare this portrait with the one he will do of himself in six months’ time.
Someday you will also see my self-portrait, which I am sending to Gauguin, because he will keep it, I hope.
It is all ashen gray against pale veronese (no yellow). The clothes are this brown coat with a blue border, but I have exaggerated the brown into purple, and the width of the blue borders.
The head is modeled in light colours painted in a thick impasto against the light background with hardly any shadows. Only I have made the eyes slightly slanting like the Japanese.
Write me soon and the best of luck. How happy old Gauguin will be.
A good handshake, and thank Freret for the pleasure he has given me. Good-by for now.
Ever yours, Vincent.


At this time, Vincent was 35 year old
webexhibits

artemisdreaming:

Above: Vincent van Gogh, Self-Portrait Dedicated to Paul Gauguin, 1888

.

Letter from Vincent van Gogh to Theo van Gogh
Arles, 7 October 1888

.

My dear Theo,

Many thanks for your letter. How glad I am for Gauguin; I shall not try to find words to tell you - let’s be of good heart.

I have just received the portrait of Gauguin by himself and the portrait of Bernard by Bernard and in the background of the portrait of Gauguin there is Bernard’s on the wall, and vice versa.

.

“Self portrait dedicated to Vincent van Gogh (Les Miserables),” Gauguin

.

“Self-portrait with portrait of Gauguin”, Emile Bernard 

.

The Gauguin is of course remarkable, but I very much like Bernard’s picture. It is just the inner vision of a painter, a few abrupt tones, a few dark lines, but it has the distinction of a real, real Manet.

The Gauguin is more studied, carried further. That, along with what he says in his letter, gave me absolutely the impression of its representing a prisoner. Not a shadow of gaiety. Absolutely nothing of the flesh, but one can confidently put that down to his determination to make a melancholy effect, the flesh in the shadows has gone a dismal blue.

So now at last I have a chance to compare my painting with what the comrades are doing. My portrait, which I am sending to Gauguin in exchange, holds its own, I am sure of that. I have written to Gauguin in reply to his letter that if I might be allowed to stress my own personality in a portrait, I had done so in trying to convey in my portrait not only myself but an impressionist in general, had conceived it as the portrait of a bonze, a simple worshiper of the eternal Buddha.

And when I put Gauguin’s conception and my own side by side, mine is as grave, but less despairing. What Gauguin’s portrait says to me before all things is that he must not go on like this, he must become again the richer Gauguin of the “Negresses.”

I am very glad to have these two portraits, for they finally represent the comrades at this stage; they will not remain like that, they will come back to a more serene life.

And I see clearly that the duty laid upon me is to do everything I can to lessen our poverty.

No good comes the way in this painter’s job. I feel that he is more Millet than I, but I am more Diaz then he, and like Diaz I am going to try to please the public, so that a few pennies may come into our community. I have spent more than they, but I do not care a bit now that I see their painting—they have worked in too much poverty to succeed.

Mind you, I have better and more saleable stuff than what I have sent you, and I feel that I can go on doing it. I have confidence in it at last. I know that it will do some people’s hearts good to find poetic subjects again, “The Starry Sky,” “The Vines in Leaf,” “The Furrows,” the “Poet’s Garden.”

.

“Starry Night over the Rhone,” Vincent van Gogh

.

“The Green Vineyard,” Vincent van Gogh

.

“Ploughed Field,” (The Forrows) Vincent van Gogh

.

“Public Park with Weeping Willow: The Poet’s Garden I,” Vincent van Gogh

.

So then I believe that it is your duty and mine to demand comparative wealth just because we have very great artists to keep alive. But at the moment you are as fortunate, or at least fortunate in the same way, as Sensier if you have Gauguin and I hope he will be with us heart and soul. There is no hurry, but in any case I think that he will like the house so much as a studio that he will agree to being its head. Give us half a year and see what that will mean.

Bernard has again sent me a collection of ten drawings with a daring poem - the whole is called At the Brothel.

You will soon see these things, but I shall send you the portraits when I have had them to look at for some time.

I hope you will write soon, I am very hard up because of the stretchers and frames that I ordered.

What you told me of Freret gave me pleasure, but I venture to think that I shall do things which will please him better, and you too.

Yesterday I painted a sunset.

Gauguin looks ill and tormented in his portrait!! You wait, that will not last, and it will be very interesting to compare this portrait with the one he will do of himself in six months’ time.

Someday you will also see my self-portrait, which I am sending to Gauguin, because he will keep it, I hope.

It is all ashen gray against pale veronese (no yellow). The clothes are this brown coat with a blue border, but I have exaggerated the brown into purple, and the width of the blue borders.

The head is modeled in light colours painted in a thick impasto against the light background with hardly any shadows. Only I have made the eyes slightly slanting like the Japanese.

Write me soon and the best of luck. How happy old Gauguin will be.

A good handshake, and thank Freret for the pleasure he has given me. Good-by for now.

Ever yours, Vincent.


At this time, Vincent was 35 year old
webexhibits
  1. monstrousmischief reblogged this from aanubis
  2. thesecondcircleofhell reblogged this from artemisdreaming
  3. chopzz reblogged this from 19o1
  4. whocamefirst reblogged this from stevens-cat
  5. lalalalinoleum reblogged this from stevens-cat
  6. doiteverydayfuckyolo reblogged this from sirobtep
  7. slippingfish reblogged this from sirobtep and added:
    vanGogh Vincent at webexhibits
  8. sirobtep reblogged this from artemisdreaming
  9. maria-constanza reblogged this from elbandidoneira
  10. elbandidoneira reblogged this from stevens-cat
  11. stevens-cat reblogged this from artemisdreaming
  12. snowonredearth reblogged this from artemisdreaming
  13. nucleosome reblogged this from aanubis
  14. xeirinix reblogged this from artemisdreaming
  15. les-litanies-de-satan reblogged this from aanubis
  16. danipat reblogged this from los-logos
  17. los-logos reblogged this from 19o1
  18. triggaahappy reblogged this from aanubis
  19. pandamoniumindragontown reblogged this from mummified
  20. giveupthelotus reblogged this from artemisdreaming
  21. mummified reblogged this from aanubis
  22. aanubis reblogged this from 19o1